unpacking

So much attention and energy needs to be spent preparing for a trip and ensuring that everything you need is properly packed away where it can be accessed (with extra attention devoted to avoiding glitches at airport security if a plane flight is involved) that it can be possible to neglect the process of unpacking when the trip is over.

I've sometimes let that ride in the past, leaving unemptied bags sitting around for days, but I try not to any more. During trips I keep the laundry clearly separated from the clean clothes, so the first piece of unpacking I do is to throw all the laundry into the washing machine. Next step is removing anything from the suitcase that stays downstairs, like shoes and coats, before hauling the suitcase up to the bedroom and putting away the clean clothes and any toiletries that were in there.

The carry-on bag is handled oppositely. That goes straight up to the bedroom; anything going there or in the bathroom is put away, and things going to my office or which belong downstairs are put in separate piles. Then the office items are taken there, and the downstairs material goes back in the bag and taken downstairs to be distributed.

Lastly, the emptied bags go back in the garage where they're kept normally.

This procedure may all seem obvious, but it's one of those things which took a lot of experience and practice to develop. The key is not to let post-trip exhaustion overwhelm the need to get this basic task done. It's so satisfying when this is all done, the bags are put away, and we're back to normal, and the cats like it that way too.

away in a Shakespeare

This year's driving visit to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival was a bit precarious, due to both B. and I being ill at various times (just a cold, but nasty enough). B. missed two plays as a result - fortunately not the best ones. I didn't miss any plays, but undertaking the six hour drive there after a night when the cold had given me no sleep was a grim business which shouldn't have been attempted.

There were six plays on our schedule, three Shakespeare:

As You Like It: utterly charming, clever, good-humored, imaginative, a delight in every way - and performed with utterly pellucid line-readings. Everything everyone said was clear and understandable. After a stark court setting, with everyone in antiseptic white, the Forest of Arden burst out as sixties hippie utopia, with everyone in it, from Duke Senior on down, dressed as flower children - except for the melancholy Jaques, who was a leftover beatnik poet in a shabby black suit. Aw, perfect.

Julius Caesar: another production by the upstart crow collective of female and nonbinary performers. The central characters of Brutus and Cassius were good enough but might have done better with the casting exchanged; but Caesar (Kate Wisniewski) exuded arrogance and self-confidence, perfect for the character. Nonspecific modern dress.

The Merry Wives of Windsor: a more conventional production than OSF's last Merry Wives, this didn't tinker with the text or add musical interjection; here the characters expressed their emotional reactions by screaming a lot. An attempt was made to frame the plot around the crafty plans by the merry wives, but this could have been more focused. The costumes were livelier: Falstaff and his cronies first sauntered in as a biker gang, and things just got sillier from there.

and three not:

The Importance of Being Earnest, Oscar Wilde: The director couldn't identify with Victorian England, so set this in the Victorian English colony of Malaya, which had little effect outside the vegetation in act 2 and the place names, which didn't make much sense. (The casting was multiracial, which would lead to genetic impossibilities in this play, so you just ignore that.) Never mind the place names either: the acting was great. Newcomer Hao Feng made a splendidly foppish Algy, and Kiki deLohr as Gwendolen mugged her way through, channeling Miss Piggy.

Into the Woods, Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine: Supposedly a revival of OSF's 2014 production which we saw, and with some of the same cast, it wasn't the same at all. With much less of the bursting clever imagination of its predecessor and a more improvisationary feel, it was just a good solid performance of Into the Woods that succeeded in making Act 2 more involving than Act 1 instead of more dour.

Fat Ham, James Ijames: Starts out as a very funny and clever resetting of Hamlet in a rural Southern Black family holding a wedding reception barbecue. The Ghost, who is still figuring out how to be one, was particularly amusing. Lots of specific Shakespearean points well translated into Black vernacular. But the author didn't want to kill the characters off, so the plot makes a turn into a closing celebration of former uptight Marine Larry (=Laertes) coming out as a drag queen. Good for him, but something of a nonsequitur in the circumstances.

caught up

B. went to the local No Kings protest on Saturday. I support the cause, but I stayed home and took a nap. I feel I've already had my say on this subject.

Instead, I went up to the City that evening for the Bay Area Rainbow Symphony's Pride celebratory concert. The music sounded interesting. Conducted by Martha Stoddard, known locally for the Oakland Civic Orchestra, it featured a timpani concerto by the Colombian/US composer Juan Sebastian Cardona Ospina, and Sibelius's Third Symphony. Both of them came across as busy and bustling.

Today I happened to be sitting in the living room when B. turned the tv on to continue watching Andor (which I persist in thinking of as "and/or" because I've been trained in Boolean logic). Although it's set in the Star Wars universe, it didn't feel to me like Star Wars at all, because the dialogue isn't stiff and inane like in all the Star Wars movies I've seen. (I haven't seen Rogue One.) But I couldn't follow what was going on, so I let it be.

catch-up

The reason for the posting gap between covering last week's San Francisco Symphony program and this week's is that I've been buried - and still am - in my part of copy-editing the papers for the next issue of Tolkien Studies. This is a major task that has been occupying all three editors. There are authors who have trouble with - well, I shouldn't say the things they have trouble with, but they have trouble with them. But that leads to the first of my catch-up news items, which is:

1. I should say, since there have been a couple of inquiries, that Tolkien Studies is alive and well. It's just delayed. A combination of various personal difficulties on top of never having quite recovered from the dent in our schedule caused by the 2022 supplement are the cause, but the 2024 (tsk) issue should have gone to the publisher (more processing time) within a month from now.

2. Last week, B. and I went to hear the San Jose Symphonic Choir give its centenary concert of singing Beethoven's Ninth, and I reviewed it for the Daily Journal. The singing and playing ranged from excellent to not so excellent, but we had a good time of it. This was the fullest I've seen the Mountain View CPA in a long time, and the fullest I've seen its parking garage ever. I had to park out on the street two blocks away, and I was lucky to find that.

3. Last November, when I was in LA (and the National Guard wasn't), I saw a delightfully clever performance of Sondheim's rarely-staged Pacific Overtures, his musical about the opening of Japan. So when I saw that another Asian-American theater company was going to do it in San Francisco, I decided to go to that one too. Friday was it, after another long day (and a drive up the coast from Santa Cruz). Follow-ups like this are rarely a success, and this wasn't. The performers were all of professional quality, but the show was bland and dull in comparison to the bright and witty I saw in LA.

3a. Near the theater, which is in the Mission District, are two Mexican restaurants I queried for dinner beforehand. Both advertise tamales, one in their menu, the other actually is called a "Tamale Parlor." Neither has any tamales. The one was out of them, the other - despite the name - doesn't even carry them. As a tamale-lover, I was very disappointed.

4. Were you under the impression that C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams wrote each other fan letters that crossed in the mail? Neither was I, but just in case you were, Sørina Higgins is out to correct you. Actually, Williams wrote, "If you had delayed writing another 24 hours our letters would have crossed," and the conditional of this phrasing attracted Søri's attention. She thinks Williams was just being polite; he wouldn't have taken the trouble of writing a letter if Lewis hadn't written him first.
What she doesn't address is the peculiarity of Williams, who was an editor in the London branch, the commercial office, of the Oxford University Press, being asked to evaluate Lewis's book which was an academic treatise being published by the Oxford branch, the academic office, of the Press, although he did suggest what was eventually used as the book's title, The Allegory of Love. What I've read elsewhere, though I can't remember where, is a suggestion that Williams being given Lewis's book was a stitch-up concocted by Humphrey Milford, the Publisher of the Press (manager of the London office, and Williams's supervisor) and R.W. Chapman, Secretary to the Delegates (manager of the Oxford office, who knew Lewis, an Oxford don) in collaboration, as they thought - quite astutely - that Williams and Lewis would be great friends if they ever met. That, by Lewis's own testimony (Preface to Essays Presented to CW), it was Chapman who first mentioned Williams's novels to Lewis is another clue.
Anyway, if this is true, then Williams's "admiration for the staff work of the Omnipotence" that brought them together should have been pitched at a slightly lower level.

Salonen: the grand finale

For his last-ever program as music director of the San Francisco Symphony (though he didn't know it would be his last-ever when he scheduled it), Esa-Pekka Salonen chose Gustav Mahler's Second Symphony, big enough to make a concert by itself. Ordinarily I'd skip out on an all-Mahler program, but I decided to attend this one (first of three performances) not just because it was EPS's last, but because I was so impressed with his interpretation of Mahler's Third at the end of last year's season.

And it wasn't as revelatory, but still extremely interesting. As with the Third, EPS divided the Second up into two unanticipated parts.

The dramatic and somber (with placid interludes) first movement of the Second is the only piece of Mahler's which can be played to sound as if it might have been written by Mahler's mentor Anton Bruckner. EPS did not direct it that way. Instead, he had it sound like the anti-Bruckner: the sound was bright, clean-cut, and almost crystal-clear throughout. If it was dark at all, it came in touches where it was creepy in the way that Saint-Saëns' Danse Macabre is creepy.

The result of this is that the delicate and wistful second movement intermezzo, which is intended to be as incongruously different from the first movement as possible, sounded just like it. Placid and calm? Yes, just like the interludes in the first movement. Loud and dramatic moments? (Yes, it has them: this is Mahler, after all.) As clear and simply bright as the first movement's.

So the first two movements were the ad hoc part 1 of Salonen's version of the Second. The third movement scherzo turned out to be the beginning of part 2. The climax at the end of this was the first loud passage in the symphony to be at all rough and chaotic or, to put it more bluntly, to sound as if it had been composed by Mahler. The long instrumental opening of the choral finale, written as something of a return to the first movement's approach, was here hairier and irregular and much more like the end of the scherzo.

What most impressed with the finale was EPS's command of the extremes of dynamics. At the choral climax, the SFS Chorus, some 140 strong, was beefy and powerful enough to stride over the full noise of the orchestra, and the final instrumental-only conclusion made an even mightier roar with multiple sets of timpani banging away and the organ at full throttle, the way I always want to hear it at the climaxes of works like Saint-Saëns's Organ Symphony or Holst's "Uranus" from The Planets.

On the other hand, the quiet was really quiet. It's difficult for a large chorus to sing as intensely quietly as Mahler directs its opening passage to be (ppp), but this ensemble managed that hush. The instrumental side could be just as quiet. EPS managed the passages with an offstage band to come across so softly that they were in perfect volume balance with active onstage performers of nothing but one flute and one piccolo.

Not to forget the work's two solo singers. Heidi Stober's soprano repeatedly rose beautifully out of the chorus, but even greater honors are due to acclaimed mezzo Sasha Cooke, who in addition to parts in the finale has a solemn and subdued prelude song, "Urlicht," between the scherzo and the finale, which she conveyed as sweet and coy in her powerful deep voice.

Huge applause afterwards for all concerned, including Chorus director Jenny Wong, who's rapidly establishing herself as the best director this choir has ever had. Unlike last week, EPS consented to take a couple of curtain calls by himself as well, though he insisted on taking them standing in the middle of the orchestra, somewhere between the second violins and violas, as if to emphasize he considers himself just one of the fabulous musicians on stage.

And thus concludes EPS's five-year tenure as Music Director of SFS. He'll turn 67 at the end of this month, a prime age for a conductor, and we could have had him for much longer if only incompetent and clueless management hadn't driven him to let his contract expire and leave. He's not returning as a guest next season and we might well never have him again. What a loss.

Salonen: the penultimate program

The San Francisco Symphony program this week was a miscellaneous assortment of four pieces, each about 20 minutes long. Perhaps that's why, even though it was music director Esa-Pekka Salonen's next-to-last program, the hall was not as packed on Saturday as it was last week. (I don't usually go to SFS on Saturday. I did this week because I was doing something else on Friday. More on that later.) The audience cheered EPS just as lustily, though, despite his attempts to modestly back off at the end.

We had:

1. Richard Strauss's two shortest - and, not coincidentally, best - tone poems, Don Juan and Till Eulenspiegel. These were played with quicksilver energy and bumptious color, so much so that, had I not known better and were told that Don Juan actually portrayed the merry prankster Till, I might have believed it. (The reverse would be less plausible.)
2. Sibelius's shortest and most cryptic symphony, the Seventh. This was played in the same manner: it was so brilliantly colorful and convincing moment-by-moment that it didn't matter where the piece was going, and indeed I wasn't sure if it was going anywhere. Each section seemed to come from a different work; there was even a moment straight out of Valse Triste.
3. A premiere, Rewilding by local composer Gabriella Smith. This celebrates the titular ecosystem restoration projects by means of musical onomatopoeia. It both begins and ends with the percussion evoking the squeaking of Smith's bicycle as she rides to and from her project sites (which is what she spends her non-musical time doing). In between are attempts at animal sounds: lots of insect swarms from the strings and bird calls of various kinds from the woodwinds, while the brass play what come across more as Ingram Marshall-style foghorns.

EPS had a definite vision for this concert, and this is an orchestra that can do anything that a good conductor asks of it.

what are they waiting for?

Here's something that bugs me, and that seems to be happening constantly these days: People who get into their cars, turn the engine on, and then just sit there, maybe checking their phone or doing nothing at all.

The reason this bugs me is that they're doing this in parking lots, and my car is next to theirs or directly across the lane, and I want to leave but I don't want to risk hitting or being hit by another car leaving at the same time, because it's awfully hard to see behind you, despite turning head and rear-view mirrors, and they got to their car before I got to mine. So I wait for them to leave. And wait, and wait ...

Occasionally I've actually gotten back out of my car, gone to theirs, knocked on the window, and asked, "Are you planning on leaving soon? Because I'm parked next to you, and I don't want to move if you're going to be moving." But mostly now I give up, and figure if they don't leave after one minute they're unlikely to leave before two, and go out myself.

But if people would just go when they're ready to - again, they've turned the engine on - there wouldn't be this problem.

no concert

B. saw an announcement that a choral group we'd never heard of was giving a free concert of Mozart's Requiem on Sunday afternoon in a local church, so we decided to go. I don't know how it came out; we didn't stay for the performance.

We'd arrived early enough to read the quite extensive comments on the strange composition history of the piece, and its musical contents, in the program book. By 3 pm, the announced time, the sanctuary was packed with concertgoers, some of them children.

The conductor stood up and started to speak into a microphone. (Not very clearly: her voice kept fading in and out.) Now, many conductors have adopted the irritating habit of speaking a few superfluous sentences before pieces, but usually they're done in a couple of minutes. Not this one. She took some 15 minutes to tell the entire story of the commissioning, composition, and publication of the Requiem. I thought about shouting out, "We can read all this in the program book! Let's hear the music!"

Perhaps I should have, because then the conductor turned to an analysis of repeated musical motifs in the Requiem, with musical illustrations by the rehearsal pianist.

It was at about this point that B. asked if we should just leave. I said I hoped the talk would be done soon. It wasn't. After five minutes - this had now gone on for 20 minutes total, and it still wasn't done - the conductor was on her third motif, and we got up and left. I walked to the back parking lot to fetch the car while B. waited at the front door. When I picked her up, the conductor was still talking.

Look, if you want to give a pre-concert talk before the concert, schedule it for an hour before showtime. Don't incorporate it into the actual program. Then people can decide if they want to attend or not. Besides, this wasn't really a pre-concert talk in content. The motivic analysis made it more like a lecture in a junior college class on Mozart.

I won't dignify the ensemble by naming it, but we certainly won't attempt to attend any more of its concerts.

transit and birds in Pittsburgh

I said I was going to write about these subjects, but my post on food got a little too long.

Both the wedding venue, just across the Monongahela River on one side of downtown, and the baseball stadium, just across the Allegheny on the other side, were a little further from my hotel than I was comfortable walking, so I was going to need to learn the bus system. I found the online guide to transit in Pittsburgh confusing and useless, and while Google Maps will tell you how to do if you need to leave right now, it's too narrowly focused to be useful for planning ahead.

I walked over to the nearest station of the light rail, which is called the T (which stands for trolley, which you'll understand if you take it out to the suburbs, where it runs down the middle of streets). It was an underground station like on BART, except no gates, because the T is free in the central city. There were, however, ticket machines for buying passes, good on both the buses and the pay parts of the T - 3-hour, 1-day, 7-day, starting from whenever you first use them, not when you buy them. All this was explained to me by helpful locals whom I enquired from.

Down in the bowels of the station was a large multiple-compartment tray with folding paper schedules for every bus line in the city. Not having time to figure out which lines I might need, I took one copy of each. They were very useful. For all of my travel plans, I'd look up the route on Google Maps, write down the numbers of all the bus lines that served it, then look up on the paper schedules where they actually went and when. This was particularly useful when I went out to my brother's house in the suburbs. I took a taxi out there (I don't do Uber), but I came back on the bus, having carefully printed out a map that would show me how to walk the 1/4 mile downhill (which is why I didn't take the bus in) to the bus stop and what time it would arrive, which was vital given that the line runs only every 90 minutes on holidays. I was relieved to find I was not the only rider on the bus.

I plotted an even more elaborate trip to the North Shore for the ball game. First I took a bus to a likely lunch place, then I walked a few blocks through a park to the National Aviary, then a longer distance distinctly downhill to the ball park. (No bus service on that route that wouldn't be more trouble than it was worth; figuring things like that out is what made the planning elaborate.) Plenty of time; the game wasn't until 4 pm. Having realized our seats were on the back side of the stadium close to the otherwise awkwardly-located local T station, I took that back downtown afterwards.

But the National Aviary, ah that was worth seeing. I enjoy aviaries, especially the walk-through kind. The San Antonio Zoo has four of them and is the best such experience I've had, but this was a close second. It's small, but is packed with birds and is all-bird. There's three walk-throughs: a grasslands one with tiny birds, mostly canaries and finches; a wetlands, which B. would have enjoyed the most, full of flamingos and odd ducks (I saw one duck, which the posted guide identified as a puna teal, chasing a flamingo around the pond); and a tropical rainforest, which featured gigantic blue parrots which missed a bet by not being the mascots of the Pittsburgh Pirates, and a large Malaysian pheasant (the Great Argus, the guidebook said) which kept throwing back its head and emitting a piercingly loud woo woo cry that echoed through the room.

There were also smaller displays featuring African penguins (tolerant of a temperate climate), lorikeets, and a giant Steller's sea eagle. And much more. There's a tiny cafeteria that includes among its offerings chicken tenders and turkey sandwiches. Roasted bird, in an aviary? I had to wonder about that.