the text police

I realize there are far more important things going on in this article, but what caught my eye in this story of dating gone wrong was the description of this as suspicious in the man's behavior: "Over the four weeks that they chatted virtually, though, he was 'hot and cold'—sometimes going silent for eight hours."

Eight hours? That's how long an average human being goes silent every day because they're asleep. I've never been used to instantaneous back-and-forth message communication, not even on e-mail, and I certainly wouldn't tolerate it now. If anyone started sending me messages at a rate at which an eight-hour gap was considered 'going silent,' I'd have to ask them to stop. The idea of being tied down to my mobile phone like that is horrifying. (When would I have the time to charge it?)

All this was going on by text, of course, and the above even leaves aside the fact that I hate texting anyway. I'm a touch typist, and any form of typing which doesn't allow me to place eight fingers on the home keys is anathema to me, I just hate it. It's even annoying at the desktop computer when I have to use one hand to hold a cat which wants to sit on my chest; cat cuddling is compatible with reading or watching videos, not writing. I will only text to send a short message for business purposes, and even then only if my recipient clearly expects it that way. Fortunately I only deal with a couple of people who are like that.

I admit that in a noisy situation, texting eliminates the problem of not being able to hear a voice call. Though I've found that, when trying to send a text in a fast-moving situation - we're both in the same building and need to meet right away, that sort of thing - the situation is usually changed (e.g. the other person has actually found me) before I can finish writing the text.

This is rendered worse because I keep getting the backspace and delete buttons on my phone mixed up in my mind. I make a typo and want to change that one last character, and suddenly find I've erased the entire message and have to start over.

I hate texting, and I won't do casual chatting that way. Thank the Lord I'm married to a woman as quiet as I am and I'm permanently out of the dating market.

four concerts

The weekend before Thanksgiving I went to three concerts. I was reviewing two of them, but the publication of the reviews was very late. So I waited to write about them until now.

1. South Bay Philharmonic, Friday
This is the community orchestra that B. is a violist in. They gathered to play Vasily Kalinnikov's First Symphony, which I've been hearing practiced in my living room almost continuously for the past several months. You may not have heard of Vasily Kalinnikov or his First Symphony, but I had. It was written just after Tchaikovsky's death, and sounds more like a Tchaikovsky symphony than anything else that isn't a Tchaikovsky symphony. I like it a lot, and enjoyed what was I think only the second time I'd heard it live. Especially the Andante, which was haunting.

2. Redwood Symphony, Saturday
This gathering was to play Dmitri Shostakovich's Fourth Symphony, which is the Very Difficult symphony I wrote on Nov. 22 that I was facing reviewing. My review says most of it, including why I was so looking forward to hearing this, which is that it's by far the most Mahlerian symphony Shostakovich ever wrote, and the Redwood Symphony does revelatory Mahler. I didn't find this performance revelatory in terms of casting insight as to how or why the composer wrote it as he did, but it was excellently done, just sizzling. I was particularly relieved that my study sessions had enabled me to internalize this "one damn thing randomly after another" piece enough to usually know what was coming next, because it really contributed to my appreciation of this first time I'd heard the piece live.

3. Peninsula Symphony and Stanford Symphonic Chorus, Sunday
Then I went to Bing to hear something by a favorite composer that I'd never heard at all, live or otherwise. Indeed, for years I hadn't even been aware that Howard Hanson had written a final, choral, seventh symphony. He called it "A Sea Symphony." So did Ralph Vaughan Williams title his choral symphony, 65 years earlier. Hanson set poems by Walt Whitman extolling the sea and shipping on the sea. So did Vaughan Williams. Hanson wrote four movements. So did Vaughan Williams. But Vaughan Williams's symphony is an hour long, Hanson's only 20. It also doesn't sound that much like Vaughan Williams, or like Hanson either, being a bit imitative but a bit watery. I'm glad I heard it, though, and I wrote a review.

Then this week, I went to hear

4. The Chamber Music Society of San Francisco, Monday
at the Freight - which does classical chamber music occasionally - in the form of a string quartet, playing Mozart's K. 575 and Beethoven's Op. 127. Good solid performances, just not as weighty as the works deserve. Large audience, mostly grey-haired.
Distressing discovery of the evening was that almost the entire block of Center Street with the good restaurants that are convenient to the BART station has been closed down for redevelopment, and will be shut off for the next two years. One of the restaurants I like has moved, but to too far away to be convenient for a pre-Freight dinner, alas.

strangulated girl

No human females are harmed in this post; the reference is to the word.

I've seen it noted that people not native to English often have particular trouble attempting to pronounce the word "squirrel." I would like to suggest a companion in that misery, and not just for second-language speakers: the phonetically slightly similar "girl."

I had noted how Prince Harry, with his cut-glass upper-crust British accent, sounded strangulated when trying to tell Oprah the (putative) sex of his then-impending child. The word didn't seem to fit his manner of talking.

But it was more recently when I was on the phone with a service representative who had, I think, some form of South Asian accent that I really began to wonder. He was reading an alpha-numeric code off to me, and for one letter said "G as in grr." "G as in what?" I asked, not sure if I'd heard the letter correctly. He repeated it. It took some time to establish that the word he was trying to say was "girl," but that neither the vowel nor the final L seemed to exist in his phonetic vocabulary. Possibly he should have picked a different word, but maybe the company had a required list.

matching Cleveland

The imminence of the second occasion in US history that a former president has returned for a second, non-consecutive term sends me thinking to the first occasion, Grover Cleveland in 1893. The question of appointees makes me wonder: did Cleveland reappoint in his second term anyone who'd served in his first term?

And the answer is, not in his Cabinet. He made a deliberate decision not to do so. One of his former cabinet officers did reappear in his administration. First-term Secretary of State Thomas F. Bayard was second-term Ambassador to the UK. Also note that William F. Vilas, who'd been Postmaster General and Secretary of the Interior in the first term, was during Cleveland's second term a US Senator, from Wisconsin, where he was a major spokesman for the administration. Some of Cleveland's other cabinet members were active in politics in a non-office-holding capacity, but their principal occupations were in private life.

Flipping the other way, of his second term major officers, Vice President Adlai E. Stevenson had been the assistant Postmaster General in the first term, and Secretary of War Daniel S. Lamont had served on the president's staff. Some others were office-holders outside of the executive branch: Secretary of the Treasury John G. Carlisle, for instance, had been Speaker of the House.

no-drama thanksgiving

Our niece hosted the usual big friends-and-family gathering today, and politics never came up. The obnoxious brothers who used to express right-wing views have now moved far away, and those few left who might share them are more circumspect. Everyone present had a good time. My brother and his fiancée came in from out of town, and I got to introduce her to the hostess's famous artichoke dip.

My own contribution was a roasted broccoli dish the recipe for which I found in my files a couple weeks ago and made for dinner at home, where it earned raves from B. and a strong suggestion I bring it for Thanksgiving. So I did even though I wasn't sure it would keep. It has broccoli, parmesan, and pine nuts, marinated in a combo of olive oil, vinegar, soy sauce, margarine, lemon juice, and just about every herb and non-hot spice in the cabinet.

Carnivorous offerings included smoked turkey, prime rib, and a beef Wellington that only appeared after most of us had eaten.

I sat for dinner next to the autistic grand-nephew who's now in his 20s and whose social skills have made impressive leaps in the last few years. I'm quite proud of him.

Afterwards, most of the family contingent drove by appointment to the nearby rehab facility where the patriarch, hostess's father, is recovering from physical difficulties and also beginning to suffer from dementia. We met him in a largish room set aside for such gatherings. He was in good cheer and easy to talk to, though he was having difficulty remembering who people were, even his own son. A sad situation.

Christopher Tolkien conference

Thursday was the centenary of the birth of Christopher Tolkien, son and literary executor of JRRT, and the man responsible - directly or indirectly - for all of the books that have come out in the last fifty years since JRRT's death with his name on them. The amount of, often very interesting, unpublished material that JRRT left behind him is very large, possibly unparalleled among major authors; and the amount of dedication displayed by CT towards that material is definitely unparalleled.

So the Tolkien Society held an online conference on Zoom last weekend to celebrate him. Being UK-based, it had rather odd time fixes over here. It started at 2 or 3 AM and finished around noon. Being often up in the middle of the night, I heard some of the early papers, but then I'd go back to bed again and missed more. Of the 28 presentations given, I heard all or part of 17.

More than half of the presentations I heard were personal testimonies of "how I worked with Christopher Tolkien." Someone described him as an 'editor-in-chief' and indeed he subcontracted out much of the work. People like Christopher Gilson, who's edited linguistic material, and Christina Scull and Wayne G. Hammond, who've edited everything, told much the same story: how their correspondence or conversation with CT led to him suggesting they might want to edit something, or at least have some suggestions as to how it might be presented in print, and that this led to a long collaboration in which CT would send photocopies of papers in his possession, carefully annotated (this page is the verso of that page; this part is in red ink; etc.), and showed infinite patience and tolerance for detail in answering questions, but his determination that the work be done right was inflexible.

There were several of these, and the same principle applied to talks by artists who've illustrated the work (Alan Lee and Ted Nasmith), to CT's own editor at his publishing house, and most interestingly to the archivist at Marquette University, where JRRT sold many of his manuscripts back in the 1950s. The talk was mostly a historical account. Not much attention was paid to these papers until CT started to need to consult them for his own work, and he developed a good relationship with the then-archivist. But what CT really needed, especially as his focus on the Marquette material increased, was a dedicated and knowledgeable on-the-spot assistant with the time and energy to do the work. And he got one: the late Taum Santoski. I knew Taum personally, though not as well as some, and I'm delighted he's received this attention in a talk that was almost more about him than about CT.

Other papers were about the work that CT did, some just generally about it being there and implying his importance by the fact that he put it out, but others focusing on the work he did and the complex interlayering of JRRT's basic writings, JRRT's commentaries on them, CT's comments on each, his arrangements of the material and his selections of them. (It's estimated that the four huge volumes on the writing of The Lord of the Rings contain only about 40% of what JRRT wrote.) Then there's the complexity of JRRT's work - the recastings, the revisions and erasures, the stories where the characters misunderstand the lore they've been told, the parts where JRRT himself wasn't sure what the answer was ... and CT's careful presentation of it all. Two papers, by Sara Brown and Kristine Larsen, discussed the Athrabeth, a key text in the legendarium, analyzing all of the layers of writing and the choices involved in editing it, and they and Verlyn Flieger emphasized even CT's courage in publishing this thing, which cut down to the bedrock of the fictional universe and touched the author's own deepest religious beliefs. I got the impression, listening to Sara and Kris speak and reading the chat function, that the mere existence of the Athrabeth was news to a lot of the attendees. There's a lot of exploring yet to be done, so let's get on and do it.

what's up

1. It's been raining, a little. Not quite the first storm of the season, as one hit while I was in LA (where it did not rain at all). Owing to Berkeley's more exposed location, I should have expected it'd be worse there went I went to see The Magic Flute on Wednesday. It wasn't so much that it was cold and drizzly as that it was windy. When I emerged from the BART station, my original plan had been to walk 3/4 of a block in one direction for dinner before coming back and walking 1 1/2 blocks in another direction to the theater. But both weather conditions and (as it turned out) time available argued against that, so I walked directly towards the theater in hopes I'd find a quick place to eat that way. On previous occasions I've stopped at a little East Asian place that serves the blandest chicken and rice imaginable, but this time I noticed an outlet of a local chain that does sub sandwiches. I don't really like subs, but I went in anyway and ordered one on their screen ordering device, then did what I usually do with meat sandwiches, which is take them apart and eat the pieces separately.

2. I do the crossword puzzles in the magazines I subscribe to. (Just in print; I've never figured out how to do an online crossword.) I fill out as much as I can, then hand it to B. who can usually do all the rest. But yesterday I could not hand it over, because for the first time in my life I succeeded at finishing a crossword puzzle. It was the one in The Week for Nov. 22. It didn't have any particularly clever clues, but it did tempt me with a few clues that were screamingly obvious, at least to me, like "Debussy composition whose title means 'The Sea'" and "Country between Ukraine and Romania."

3. I'm reviewing a Very Difficult symphony on Saturday. I know the work, but not as well as I'd need to. So I've been listening and re-listening to recordings, with online scores and with commentary from the books I have on the composer. In addition to being Very Difficult, it's also Very Long, so this is taking a while.

4. We bought a new tv set. Our old one, which must be at least 20 years old, was fading in color saturation. I confirmed with Consumer Reports that Samsung, which we had, was still the best brand for smaller sets (our new one is 32", just small enough to fit on the table we put it on), and I went down to Best Buy - the independent retail appliance stores around here are mostly gone - and bought one off the shelf. To my astonishment, all the cables from the old one still fit the new one. What we had problems with was the new feature, access to streaming services. Some of the ones we have subscriptions to worked OK, others failed loading in eccentric ways. That was the first day. Over the next couple of days, they got better. Still, the number of times I had to enter a code from the screen into the company's web site on my tablet before it would let me in was irksome.

opera review: The Magic Flute again

Last June, I went to the San Francisco Opera's Magic Flute, which I found so boring and dreary that I got up at intermission and never went back.

This week I decided to give Mozart's wayward opera a chance again with The Matchbox Magic Flute, adapted and directed by Mary Zimmerman and given by Berkeley Rep, which is a theater company and not an opera company, and it did sound like it.

That's part of what made it "matchbox." The word meant that it was small-scale: designed for a small theater, cut down to two hours instead of three, minor characters as well as plot distractions and lengthy dialogue disposed of, simple staging, a pit band of only five players, and singers who would have been more at home in musical theater than grand opera. But since The Magic Flute is a Singspiel and not an opera, that's appropriate.

Kosman hated it: he claimed that it retained the original's entire pointless plot (not true) and that the singers weren't up to the music. It's certainly true that Mariene Fernandez as Pamina was the only one who sounded like an opera singer, and that Emily Rohm was too weak in her high notes for such a powerhouse part as the Queen of the Night. But I attend enough musical theater, and dislike operatic grandiosity for its own sake enough, that I didn't mind that. What I really regretted was that most of the singers didn't have clear enough enunciation and it was hard to make out the words. Usually opera companies put up supertitles, but since Berkeley Rep isn't an opera company, they didn't. The Lamplighters, the local Gilbert & Sullivan group, do use supertitles even though their singers all have outstandingly clear enunciation. The only performer in this cast who sounded as clear as that was Shawn Pfautsch as Papageno, who has done G&S.

But was it fun to watch? Yes! It was clever and witty and charming and I had a good time. Zimmerman's translation, insofar as I could make it out, was naturally phrased and fit the music well. I liked the sly contemporary references, and making Papageno into a bird himself, not just a bird-catcher, meant that he could be silenced by removing the beak that he otherwise wore (and when, while wearing it, he was offered some wine, he drank it like one of those bobbing duck toys).

concert review: San Jose Chamber Orchestra

I attended and reviewed an unexpectedly unusual concert on Sunday. Here, the headline my editors put on it says it all: San Jose Chamber Orchestra Plays Two Works With Three Conductors.

musical events

Not really concerts as I normally go to them, but certainly musical:

1) Caroline Shaw and Gabriel Kahane
This was at Herbst and sponsored by the classical promoter, and the performers both have classical credentials, but it was more like a singer-songwriter event at the Freight, not least in consisting of one set lasting just over an hour. Kahane, at piano, and Shaw, sometimes with viola, sang and played reflective and ruminative songs they'd severally and jointly written, many of them forming a cycle called "Hexagons" whose lyrics set them in Borges's Library of Babel. That made it a pretty high-culture event, even by Freight standards, but the music didn't indulge in any of the post-modernist abstractions both composers are known for. It would have fit right in with the more ethereal and thoughtful performers at the Freight, much more than it did with anything else I hear at Herbst.

2) Palo Alto Players, Fiddler on the Roof
It's been a while since I've seen a production of this; happy to do so again. The first thing you need for this show is a Tevye with real stage presence, and in Joey McDaniel they had that. Golde (Brittney Mignano) was strong; the girls (Gabrielle Goodman, Madelyn Davis-Haddad, Teagan Murphy) did a great job with "Matchmaker Matchmaker"; Yente (Marsha van Broek) was emphatically Yenteish to the delight of all; Fruma-Sarah (Marie Finch) loomed adequately; Motel (Joe Steely) sang a better "Miracle of Miracles" than the song deserved. But in a show like this there always has to be one performer who can't sing. This was Perchik. He acted his part very well, but ... he could not sing.
Despite a large cast, a little thin-sounding in the ensemble numbers, but well-staged, good costumes, an enjoyable show. Playing through Nov. 24 at Lucie Stern.