Tuesday, January 7, 2025

ave Vaughan Williams

Vaughan Williams and His World, ed. Byron Adams and Daniel M. Grimley (University of Chicago Press, 2023)

U Chi Press announced a sale on their musicology books, and the only one I really wanted was this collection of essays. I consider VW to be one of ... what? "the greatest"? Too dogmatic. "my favorite"? True, but too weak. "most profound, most moving"? maybe ... composers out there, and I enjoy reading about him, despite his living a placid and uneventful life. (Well, there was the ménage à trois, but let's ignore that.)

The book has a lot of interesting articles, discussing his visits to the US, his time teaching composition at the Royal College of Music (did you know that his students included Anna Russell? the musical parodist? VW complained that her Sullivan pastiches were getting into his head and interfering with his own music), lots on the technique and placing of his film music.

But the best article is the last one, by the conductor (and frequent writer) Leon Botstein. It's a sweeping discussion of the nature, meaning, and evaluation of VW's music. It begins with a fine description of the same argument I've been making about what I call "the hidden city." By the time of VW's death in 1958, music like his was in critical disrepute, while high modernism, especially atonality, had the prestige. His music was thought dull and insignificant. But over the decades since, the cult of modernism has faded, and "the emergence of new music with overt spiritual and expressive ambitions, evident links to popular cultural forms, and free of a lingering distaste for nineteenth-century Romanticism" has also also encouraged a re-evaluation of earlier 20th century music. VW shares these aesthetics, especially that of creating music informed by a deep philosophical basis. Botstein then goes into that basis, attributing this particular form to VW's specific generation, citing his friendships, began as students at Cambridge, with the philosopher G.E. Moore and the historian G.M. Trevelyan. (VW also knew Bertrand Russell there, but he had less impact.) Botstein traces how VW's views on the function and ethics of music, apparent in his compositions, reflected the work of these thinkers (and also that of the historian H.A.L. Fisher, who was VW's brother-in-law). VW himself read history, music not being a topic for an undergraduate major in his time.

Botstein concludes by comparing VW to two slightly younger prose writers who shared a similar aesthetic. Surprise, they're Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. Specifically and most interestingly, he says that Tolkien, despite his deep Catholic faith, showed in his fiction "a resolute, universal, and essentially secular sensibility," with which I agree - Tolkien was deliberately trying not to limit his audience to fellow believers. In this, and in the religious sensibility which nevertheless drapes his works, Tolkien was like VW, who, though not a churchman, was open to the spiritual and moral world attached to religion - he wrote a lot of religious music. But where Tolkien seems to reject the modern (overstated, but it's there), VW sought to integrate it.

Botstein writes a lot about VW's holding beauty in music as a virtue, rather ignoring works like the brutal (but also curiously jolly) Fourth Symphony and the nihilistic Sixth. But that could be part of his engagement with the modern. Anyway, fascinating essay.

5 comments:

  1. I once heard Botstein conduct RVW 4. "I bet that's a great piece in the hands of a better conductor." And indeed it is. He is a better writer than conductor, and fortunately there are good conductors around.

    I wish a local orchestra would program all of the RVW symphonies. I remain astonished that SFS doesn't perform "A Sea Symphony," given how good the chorus is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've heard at least 6 of the 9 RVW symphonies live, though I had to go to London to hear the "Antartica". (That wasn't why I went to London, but I did grab the opportunity once I was there.) I've heard the "Sea" live at least three times, once at the cathedral in San Jose.
      Yan Pascal Tortelier led an excellent Fourth with SFS in 2009; that was the performance that revealed to me that the work was ... "jaunty" is the word I used at the time.
      Botstein's Henry Cowell concert, which I'd considered going to, turned out to be OK once it finally made it online.

      Delete
    2. Tortelier turned out to be the better conductor. I was also at his 2009 performances of the 4th.

      Also saw Vänskä do the London. You're very lucky to have heard the "Sea." Someday, I hope.

      Delete
  2. "Despite his age—he was approaching forty-two in October—Vaughan Williams volunteered for military service on the outbreak of the First World War in August. Joining the Royal Army Medical Corps as a private, he served as a stretcher bearer in an ambulance crew in France and later in Greece. Frogley writes of this period that Vaughan Williams was considerably older than most of his comrades, and "the back-breaking labour of dangerous night-time journeys through mud and rain must have been more than usually punishing". The war left its emotional mark on Vaughan Williams, who lost many comrades and friends, including the young composer George Butterworth. In 1917 Vaughan Williams was commissioned as a lieutenant in the Royal Artillery, seeing action in France from March 1918. The continual noise of the guns damaged his hearing, and led to deafness in his later years. After the armistice in 1918 he served as director of music for the British First Army until demobilised in February 1919." (from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Vaughan_Williams).
    Not entirely "placid and uneventful", then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Largely so. So was Tolkien's, who also served on the front in WW1.
      Director of music ... ooh, that's a hazardous occupation.

      Delete